Lilly Lake Protection & Rehabilitation District

Rev. 20-May-2018 Back to Home

May 12, 2018 meeting summary

The spring meeting took place on May 12, 2018, in the Town Hall. Board members present: Bill Glembocki, Andy Lois, and Sheila Siegler. Also, 15 residents attended. Below are brief notes on the main topics that came up during the meeting:

Water Patrol
When Salem Lakes dissolved its water patrol department, we lost their services. So the Town Board is working with Paddock and Camp Lakes to contract with Racine and other Deputies to patrol on weekends and holidays. The times of patrol and specific personnel will vary. Everyone needs patrolling at the same high-traffic times. The pool of Deputies will do its best to cover all the lakes.

Wheatland bought a used boat from Randall. It will be available for rescue operations if needed.

Last year just 5 citations were issued. Tickets are decreasing because the water patrol has tamed wild boaters.

Water Quality and Clarity
Mike Adam started taking water samples in April. On May 9, the water level was 757.3, which is 8-1/2 inches below the level just before ice formation.

On July 7 at 10 AM, Mike will run a "know your lake" session at the beach. Rain date is July 14. If enough watercraft are available, attendees will look at various things of interest around the lake.

Fish stocking
On Nov. 10, our contractor added 124 Northern Pike to the lake. Anecdotal evidence says that there are fewer small fish around the piers.

Weed Treatment
Marine Biochemists has warned the Town that the DNR is changing its weed treatment policy regarding Milfoil. They are going to require whole-lake treatment. They want to avoid damage to native weeds. Treatment would be early in the season. There probably would not be any late-season spot treatments to contain Milfoil patches with unexpected growth.

The expectation is that we'd do a whole-lake treatment and then nothing for several years. Spot treatment would only be allowed to correct navigational issues. Right now, it's unclear what the final DNR rules will be. The new regimen would start next year.

A whole-lake treatment costs around $18,000, which we have not budgeted for. The price varies by depth and concentration of the weed killer. Lots of variable affect effectiveness.

Hopefully, more will be known about the new DNR rules by the time of our annual meeting in August.

Beach Issues
The beach is groomed, but weeds still grow.

Raking water weeds may make the water weedier because seeds are stirred up

There is a hole near the black pipe that's a tripping hazard. The Town has tried to fill it in, but rain moves the sand around. The Town tried a shorter pipe and rip rap, but people throw the stones into the lake. The rip rap near the boat launch also gets thrown into the lake.

Lighting at Beach
A resident contacted WE Energies to see if the street light near the beach could be changed to LEDs to improve brightness and discourage the kind of activities that take place at the beach at night. The answer was no. You may get resident complaints about the lights being too bright.

Geese
We cannot do anything about the migratory geese that fly in for a short time. No one has reported families of geese hanging around the lake.

Top

August 12, 2017 annual meeting summary

The annual meeting took place on August 12, 2017, in the Town Hall. Board members present: Bill Glembocki, Andy Lois, Kelly Wilson, and Sheila Siegler. Kyle Dangelser, water patrol officer, Kathy Aron, and 22 residents also attended. Below are brief notes on the main topics that came up during the meeting:

Financial Report
Public Comments
The Lily Lake Resort is disturbing the peace. Their loud music goes on till late at night. No one can enjoy any quiet or their own entertainment.

Bill Glembocki will talk to the owners and remind them that the outdoor speakers have to be turned off at 10 PM.

Water Relief Gate
Glembocki contacted the DNR to discuss options. They don't see the idea as practical.
Weed Control
Water Levels & Quality
Mike Adam showed his charts (1 and 2) of water-level readings that he's taken since 2011 and charts of past quality readings.
Set "Cancel SNW" Criterion Now
Can we just set the water level that cancels SNW now? We have this argument every time SNW becomes an issue.
No, we can't vote on it now because it's not on today's agenda. District residents need to know ahead of time what's going to be discussed. Also, the Board has to consult the Town's lawyer.

The Town Board will discuss the issue at its Aug 14 meeting, but right now there are strong liabilities to lifting SNW. E.g., little kids can be swept off the pier or pushed around on the sand by strong waves.

Fish stocking
The next stocking will probably be in November, if the supplier has the fish: approximately 100 ten-to-twelve-inch pike.

Geese
Geese have not been much of a problem this year. Right now, they're hanging around to pick up scraps after the wheat harvest.

Water Patrol
Budget for the Next Dredging
Shouldn't we start saving for the next dredging so that the cost won't hit everyone so hard?
Yes, we can set up a restricted fund. It's unlikely that there will be federal or State help for a future dredging the way there was for the past dredging.

Beach improvement
The committee is still discussing ideas.

Next year's annual meeting: August 11, 2018
Top

Lake dredging history

What was the problem?

By 1970, the process of vegetation decay had filled the lake with muck to the point where the maximum water depth was 6 ft. Weeds were rampant. Underlying organic sediment was 30 to 35 ft deep. Some spots were so shallow that you could not run a motor boat. Activities like fishing and water skiing were very limited, and the experience was low quality. Winter fish kills caused dead, smelly fish to wash up on the shore in spring. No one was putting any money into the area. There was a real risk that property values would decline significantly due to the worsening condition of the lake.
Back to Lake dredging

What was the proposed solution?

Studies resulted in a proposal to dredge about 890,000 cubic yards (550 acre-feet, that is, 550 acres to a depth of 1 ft) of sediment out of the lake to increase the depth to about 22 ft. Some of the muck was spread on nearby farm land, but most of it was piped to a modified gravel pit about 2 miles away (off Hwy W, south of F and FR, near the Schwarz Nursery).
Back to Lake dredging

Who was involved in the project?

Don Puchalski led the effort, starting in 1971. He worked with the Town Board, engineering firms, the State, and the federal government. Although the project started out as a local one, new programs initiated at the State and federal levels offered some help with the financing. Changing environmental laws and financing programs delayed project start several times. At one point, the 5-year permit ran out. The government did extensive testing to ensure that the sludge would not harm the environment.

Engineer Associates of Elkhorn tested feasibility, prepared initial plans, and got a permit from the Wisconsin DNR. In 1974, Jensen and Johnson of Elkhorn took over planning and preparation of environmental impact statements. Johnson and Averill of Waukesha completed the design and development of the whole project. Robers Dredge of LaCrosse did the dredging. Mann Brothers of Elkhorn constructed the disposal site.
Back to Lake dredging

When and how was it done?

Dredging occurred over 2 years: July, 1978 through September, 1979. The first year, work started at 6 am and finished at 10 pm every day. The second year, it was decided to run 24 hours/day for 4 days of every week to avoid the jarring noise of diesel engine startup at 6 am and to allow use of the lake on weekends..

A 12-inch cutterhead sucked out muck and weeds. Two miles of welded, 12-inch polyethylene pipe carried sludge to the gravel pits. A booster station around the Riley and Topczewski property helped pump muck up hill. Property owners were paid $0.15/ft per year for a pipeline easement. Some of the muck was also applied to 160 acres of farmers' fields. Farmers got $40/acre/year for the loss of use of their land. After project completion, they got the benefit of decayed organic matter on their fields. People report seeing fish coming out of the pipe at the gravel pit. The entire shoreline was cleaned and graded at completion of the project.

During the dredging, use of the lake was minimal. The shoreline stretched out 200 ft in places. You could do a little boating and swimming in the middle of the lake. One pocket (about 100 ft by 300 ft) on the north shore had to be left because the water level was too low to work it. It was only in 1980 that the lake filled back out to its present size.
Back to Lake dredging

What did it cost?

Federal: $350,000
Local: $225,000
State: $155,000
Total: $730,000
Back to Lake dredging

What are the benefits?

New muck is accumulating at the rate of about 1/4 inch per year. At that rate, it will be about 200 years before Lilly Lake has to consider another dredging project.

Dredging pictures

Many thanks to Kathie Cashman for these pictures of the dredging operation.

Dredging rig
Dredging rig
View 1
Lake view 1
View 2
Lake view 2
Winter
Dredging site in winter
Topor Back to Lake dredging

Former resident KC provided the following pictures of the dredging operation taken in 1979 from the properties at 7717 and 7723 334th Ave.:

Topor Back to Lake dredging

Copyright © 2016 Lily Lake Summerhaven Association
Lilly Lake (Wisconsin)